Articles Posted in Morgan Stanley Smith Barney

On Wednesday, Adorian Boleancu, a former San Francisco Bay Area stockbroker was indicted and charged with 27 counts of fraud. The charges, which include allegations of elder financial abuse, stem from activities between 2007 and 2011 that resulted in Boleancu being permanently barred from the securities industry by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $650,000 to an elderly widow he purportedly defrauded. Boleancu was disbarred by FINRA back in March 2013. The victim also filed lawsuits against the Boleancu’s former employers Wells Fargo Advisors and Morgan Stanley seeking damages in excess of $2 million. The lawsuits were ultimately referred to arbitration before FINRA. FINRA is the largest dispute resolution forum for securities complaints. For more information about FINRA arbitration, click here.

mssb.jpgCitigroup Global Markets, Inc has been fined $500,000 by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) for failing to supervise and detect securities fraud committed by former Smith Barney sales assistant Tamara Moon who worked in the firm’s Palo Alto, California, branch office. (Smith Barney is a division of Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and is now doing business as part of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC.) As reported in a previous blog posting, Tamara Moon was barred from the industry back in 2009 for bilking as much as $750,000 from elderly and vulnerable customers, including her own father, by taking advantage of Smith Barney’s lax supervision. According to FINRA, the firm failed to detect or investigate numerous “red flags” that should have alerted them to Moon’s fraud. Brad Bennett, FINRA’s Executive Vice President and Chief of Enforcement noted that “Citigroup had reason to know what she was doing and could have stopped her.”

Although the firm agreed to reimburse customers and pay a $500,000 fine, the firm consented to the entry of FINRA’s findings without having to admit or deny the charges. The practice of paying a substantial fine without having to admit any findings of wrongdoing is a standard procedure in FINRA settlements.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has fined Morgan Stanley $3 million and ordered it to pay restitution of more than $4.2 million to a group of investors who were encouraged to take early retirement and begin making systematic withdrawals from their Individual Retirement Accounts by relying on Section 72(t) of the Internal Revenue Code. Normally, individuals under the age of 59 ½ who take money out of their IRA are subject to a 10% early withdrawal penalty. This penalty, however, can be avoided if the distributions “are part of a series of substantially equal periodic payments” that last for five years or until the individual reaches the age of 59 ½, whichever is longer.

According to FINRA, customers in their 50s were told that, even though they had not yet reached the minimum distribution age, they could retire now and start taking systematic withdrawals from their accounts. The customers were assured that they could withdrawal 10 percent from their IRA each year without reducing their principal. The customers were not aware that the amount of income promised was unreasonably high and was based on aggressive and unsuitable investment strategies. A more appropriate and realistic withdrawal rate would have been between 3% – 5% per year. FINRA’s former Chief of Enforcement Susan L. Merrill publicly commented that: “Brokerage firms and brokers who serve investors considering retirement must ensure that their customers are given suitable investment recommendations based upon reasonable assumptions of market performance and are given thorough disclosure of investment risks. The supervisory failures of Morgan Stanley and its management led to losses suffered by customers at a vulnerable time in their lives–retirement–which could have been avoided.”

Here is a bit of good news for investors with securities arbitration claims against 14 of the largest brokerage firms, including Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney and Wells Fargo. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has agreed to extend its year-old pilot program established to give investors the option to request an arbitration panel composed entirely of arbitrators that are not affiliated with the securities industry. Currently, a 3-person arbitration panel must include one industry arbitrator and two public arbitrators. The pilot program was created in response to criticism over whether an industry arbitrator, such as a stockbroker or branch manager, can act impartially when a customer is complaining about securities fraud or account mismanagement by their broker. I’ve participated in arbitrations with both good and bad industry arbitrators. The trouble is, allowing an industry arbitrator to sit on a panel gives the appearance of bias and takes away from the legitimacy of the proceedings. That should be reason enough to dump the industry arbitrator. My California securities law firm is in favor of the pilot program and we have been actively encouraging clients to participate whenever possible.

The brokerage firms who have agreed to participate in the pilot program are:

Ameriprise Financial Services Charles Schwab Chase Investment Services Citigroup Global Markets Edward Jones Fidelity Brokerage Services LPL Financial Merrill Lynch Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Oppenheimer Raymond James TD Ameritrade UBS Financial Services Wells Fargo Advisors / Wachovia Securities

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently announced that a former Smith Barney sales assistant working out of the firm’s Palo Alto, California, branch office was barred from the industry for securities fraud law violations that included bilking customers out of more than $850,000. Under the agreement reached with FINRA, the firm agreed to reimburse customers that were victimized by the actions of their former employee, Tamara Lanz Moon of Redwood City, California.

The improper activities went undetected for more than 8 years ending in March 2008. Moon’s victims were mostly elderly individuals that were less likely to monitor their accounts. Moon allegedly forged customer’s signatures so that she could make transfers between accounts that she controlled. Click here to view FINRA’s Press Release.

Contact Information